Tag: Galaxy Watch 4

  • Samsung Reportedly Tweaks Battery Sizes in Good, Bad Ways for Galaxy Watch 4

    Samsung Reportedly Tweaks Battery Sizes in Good, Bad Ways for Galaxy Watch 4

    Every time a new rumor pops up that involves the Galaxy Watch 4 from Samsung, I’m glued to my monitor. It’s not that Samsung watches are the most interesting of products released each year, but there are serious suggestions from those in the know that Samsung will switch off of Tizen and back to Wear OS.

    And because Wear OS has been so awful for so long with fewer and fewer players making Wear OS watches, this could be huge for the platform. Not only would it signal an acceptance of Wear OS from the biggest Android maker in the game, it could be a sign that Google finally has plans to make Wear OS something better.

    Our hope is that there are big improvements in many areas, but one in particular would be battery life. Wear OS watches do not last long unless you put a huge battery in them, like Mobvoi did with the TicWatch Pro 3. If the latest rumor about Samsung’s Galaxy Watch 4 line-up is to be believed, we have reasons to be a little worried.

    Korean outlet The Elec is suggesting today that the Galaxy Watch 4 will come in both 41mm and 45mm sizes, just like the Galaxy Watch 3. For those watches, we’ll see a dip in battery size from the Watch 3 to the Watch 4 on the 41mm model (247mAh to 240mAh). On the bigger 45mm Watch 4, we could get an increase from 340mAh to 350mAh.

    That’s a mixed bag of changes and I can’t say I like either. Since we don’t know the chipset for Samsung’s new watches, and we know the Galaxy Watch 3 suffered from poor battery life in our testing, this news doesn’t leave me feeling super optimistic about Samsung’s return to Wear OS. I would have loved to see big increases in battery size rather than such minimal changes. Smartwatches aren’t that fun when you have to worry about battery life and charge them every single day.

    Here’s to hoping for big Wear OS surprises in the coming months.

    // The Elec

  • Galaxy Watch 3 is $80 Off, Hopefully Because the Galaxy Watch 4 is Coming

    Galaxy Watch 3 is $80 Off, Hopefully Because the Galaxy Watch 4 is Coming

    The Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 saw an $80 price drop today to a starting price of $319.99. Since this watch line gets regular discounts like this it could mean nothing, but with rumors of a Galaxy Watch 4 picking up steam, I’m going to tell myself we’re getting price cuts because new watches are coming. If I’m wrong, whatever. Let me live.

    To grab the Galaxy Watch 3 for $80 off (our review), head to whichever electronics dealer you love. Samsung has both 41mm and 45mm watches at $80 off, plus they’ll give you extra off if you have other goodies to trade-in. Amazon has the deals too, as does Best Buy.

    The Galaxy Watch 3 is Samsung’s fanciest to date, with beautiful displays, rotating bezels, and heavy steel cases. All of the fitness and sleep tracking features are here, as are swappable bands and choices of case color. Samsung did a nice job with the Galaxy Watch 3.

    To grab one at $80 off, hit those links below.

  • Samsung Really Might be Close to Launching Wear OS Watches

    Samsung Really Might be Close to Launching Wear OS Watches

    I’m still not sure my mind is ready to believe it, but the folks who dig deep into software to find hints of upcoming goods are convinced that Samsung really is making Wear OS watches again. In the latest leak of sorts, Samsung has apparently left evidence of the way these watches will connect from the Galaxy Wear app through Wear OS and your phone.

    The info comes from Max Weinbach, who dug into the latest build of the Galaxy Wear app and found references to two supposed Wear OS watches, the sizes of their cases, and the plugin that ties them together.

    The latest Galaxy Wear app contains a new plugin called “water” that Weinbach refers to as the new “Samsung wearable/Wear OS compatibility layer.” For those who have owned a Samsung wearable or pair of earbuds before, this is likely a similar plugin to the one you had to install when you first connected your device. It’s an obnoxious step that Samsung has as a part of their wearable ecosystem, but it probably keeps the Wearable app size down. It looks like their Wear OS watches will need a similar plugin.

    That “water” plugin has references to “fresh” and “wise” within it, which are the codenames of the watches we believe to be Samsung’s new Wear OS watches. The thought here is that Samsung will release Watch Active 4 and Galaxy Watch 4 models running Google’s wearable OS. All of these references were accompanied by something Samsung calls “newos.”

    Finally, the Galaxy Wear app mentions 40/41mm and 44/45mm watch sizes as well as Bluetooth and LTE models for these new watches. Sounds about right for a Samsung watch line-up.

    Y’all as ready as I am for Samsung to save Wear OS? With plugins showing up inside new app versions of Samsung’s wearable software, we have to be close, right?

  • Is a New Samsung Wear OS Watch Interesting?

    Is a New Samsung Wear OS Watch Interesting?

    That’s the question I keep asking myself now that we have both rumors and a possible code reference to Samsung working on a Wear OS watch for the first time since the platform launched in 2014. I can’t decide if Samsung should make a Wear OS watch again or if they should stay far away.

    To catch you up, we think Samsung is working on a Wear OS watch because we first had a rumor from a consistently accurate Samsung leaker suggest so. That rumor was quickly followed by a report that Samsung had left a bit of code in their kernel source which acknowledges a product called “Merlin” that has something to do with Wear OS. That’s noteworthy because Samsung hasn’t touched Wear OS since 2014’s Gear Live and has instead only released watches running their own Tizen operating system. As one of the bigger players in the smartwatch game, it would be a huge move for Samsung to switch platforms.

    Would it be a good move? Again, that’s where we come back to the title question. I don’t know! Here’s what I can tell you.

    Wear OS is still very much an outdated, barely-working-at-times wearable platform that Google has almost completely abandoned. They care so little about Wear OS that their leaders don’t even know if or when it participates in their own developer conference. Some of its most important features have been broken for months and are now only getting attention from Google because the media made a stink about them. People constantly ask Google if it’s a dead platform.

    Google tries to tell us they are investing in Wear OS and wearables every few months, so we at least have that to go on. We got a decent Wear OS update last fall too. It wasn’t major major, but it was an update that showed Google is still working on it. We even have new a Snapdragon Wear 4100 chip with lots of promise, just no one willing to use it outside of Mobvoi (and maybe Motorola). I think it’s generally safe to say that Wear OS is not a thriving platform, has few partners making devices, and would have died years ago if not for Fossil keeping it alive with its many brands.

    But what if Samsung did make a Wear OS watch? Well, Samsung does make nice hardware. The Galaxy Watch Active 2 was a fabulous fitness-focused watch, while the Galaxy Watch 3 is certainly premium feeling. They make their own wearable chips that are regularly updated with the times. They do cool things, like add in rotating bezels and try and track advanced health metrics. Samsung makes really nice smartwatches – they just don’t run Wear OS.

    Where I think the idea becomes interesting is only because a switch for Samsung could very well mean that Google has fresh plans for Wear OS. Does that mean a brand new UI and new apps and services and a mature Wear OS unlike anything we’ve seen before? Eh, maybe? Or maybe Samsung will simply bring all of their stuff over.

    An example of that is the OPPO Watch or the TicWatch Pro 3, where both companies have put a ton of their own software on these watches with companion apps that sync over to smartphones, almost outside of Wear OS. They even put their own app launchers on because Google’s is so frustrating to use. Samsung could do something similar with Samsung Health, while they then rely on Google for most of the rest, like Google Assistant, notifications, Google apps, etc.

    There’s another part of me that thinks the really big move would be for Google to open Wear OS a bit more, let someone like Samsung slap One UI on top of it, and use it more like they do Android on a phone. With such little interest in Wear OS the way it is now, it’s time for Google to let companies show their own visions. In a way, we’ve seen companies like Fossil do this, where they added battery modes and sleep tracking because Google couldn’t find the time to. But these companies could certainly take things to another level if Google would let them.

    Getting back to the topic I hand, I think yes, Samsung making a Wear OS watch is interesting. It’s not just interesting because Samsung makes nice smartwatches, though. Instead, the details I want to know are in the why Samsung would come back to Wear OS. What is Google up to?

  • Samsung Source Code Hints at Wear OS-Powered ‘Merlot’ Smartwatch

    Samsung Source Code Hints at Wear OS-Powered ‘Merlot’ Smartwatch

    Thanks to a lot of work from @MishaalRahman, digging through a pile of kernel source code, a hint has been discovered that appears to back up the biggest unconfirmed news in town: Samsung is making a Wear OS smartwatch.

    According to Mishaal’s discovery, lines of code in the kernel source for One UI 3.1 reference a Wear OS device believed to be codenamed Merlot. Not too much else is detailed in the code, but Broadcom’s BCM43013 combo chip (Bluetooth + WiFi) is also mentioned. Mishaal notes that no Merlot reference is made in the One UI 3.1 firmware itself, which would have added much more fuel to the fire.

    I will say, these things are never an accident. First it was @UniverseIce saying Samsung was going to make an Android (Wear OS) watch. I can’t recall a time that person has been wrong about something related to Samsung. Now we have source code pointing to a mystery Wear OS device in Samsung’s One UI software. If I was a betting person, I’d have no problem placing a wager that we do see Samsung launch a Wear OS device. Why are they doing this? I have no idea, as I thought Wear OS was essentially a dead platform, but the hints are piling up.

    This is exciting.

    // @MishaalRahman

  • Samsung Returning to Android for Next Smartwatch, Ditching Tizen

    Samsung Returning to Android for Next Smartwatch, Ditching Tizen

    I’m trying to think of the last time Samsung used the Android platform for a smartwatch. Give me a moment. Was it really the original Gear Live? That watch launched in 2014, being one of the very first Android Wear devices. Since then, the company has been using its in-house Tizen platform for wearables. According to the latest intel from a trusted Samsung insider, things are about to change.

    Detailed by @UniverseIce on Twitter, Samsung’s upcoming smartwatch will use “Android” — we assume Wear OS — to replace Tizen as the OS. This is an all hands on deck kind of move, people. Considering Wear OS is what some could argue to be a dead platform (editor’s note: I literally make this argument every week on our podcast), seeing adoption from a very small amount of device makers, Fossil being one of them, Samsung could breathe a massive amount of life into Google’s wearable OS.

    But, why? Most Tizen users I speak to love their Galaxy Watch devices and have hardly any complaints about the OS. Why would Samsung ditch it for Google’s platform? It makes zero sense to me in this moment. Heck, the Snapdragon Wear 4100 chipset was announced what feels like forever ago and we’re still waiting on watch makers besides Mobvoi to use the damn thing. Regardless, if this info is accurate, it’s huge news and we’ll update you when we learn more.

    What do you think, Tizen users? Will this move chap your behind or are you down with a return to Wear OS?